Radio waves instead of X-rays. Innovation in osteoporosis diagnosis

Osteoporosis often remains undetected for many years. An innovation in osteoporosis diagnosis is the use of radiofrequency technology. What advantages do they have over traditional X-rays?

Osteoporosis diagnosis vs. bone densitometry

The condition of bones is most often determined on the basis of their mineral density, tested at the primary reference sites – the lumbar spine and the neck of the femur. If a bone densitometry result suggests a mineral density level that is too low, it clearly indicates an increased risk of potential fracture. According to the findings of the World Health Organization, the results of this test can be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Patients are classified according to standard guidelines, indicating normal, osteopenia or osteoporosis. Bone mineral density testing also makes it possible to determine an individual’s risk of fracture and to determine what type of medical therapy should be applied.

DXA bone density testing

The standard method of bone density testing is absorptiometry suboj energy X-rays, or DXA. The use of this technique involves sending energy through a properly positioned X-ray tube, through the patient’s spine and hip. The information provided is then processed by computer software, assessing bone mass expressed in g/cm2.

The DXA method unfortunately has many limitations. Due to the low availability of expensive instrumentsow, identification of fracture risk is virtually impossible. The patient must be properly positioned during the examination, which often translates into difficulty in correctly interpreting the result. This leads to numerous inaccuracies created at the stage of analyzing the study. DXA software mostly provides automatic identification of the sites given to the diagnosis, at the target site of the examined bone. For the result to be reliable, the system settings must be manually adjusted each time by the technician.

R-tech early osteoporosis testing.E.M.S

A more modern method of bone mineral density testing is the use of R.E.M.S. (For more on this topic: https://noraxmedical.en/products/system-echos/), that is, radiofrequency waves. This solves most of the limitations of the DXA method, concerning e.g. Manual image segmentation and the requirement for proper patient positioning. These aspects do not affect the accuracy of densitometry.

This is because the slope between the bone and the ultrasound beam depends solely on the positioning of the head. The test makes it possible to obtain a detailedoł medical report, whichory shows the microstructure of the inner bone. On its basis, all potential disease symptoms of osteoporosis can be indicated, without exposing the patientow on the negative effects of X-rays. R technology bone mineral density status testing.E.M.S allows regular monitoring of the patient’s condition, and thus early identification of the disease.

Osteoporosis often goes undetected for many years. Innovation in osteoporosis diagnosis is the use of radiofrequency technology. What advantages they have over traditional X-rays?

Osteoporosis diagnosis vs. bone densitometry

The condition of bones is most often determined by their mineral density, which is tested at the primary reference sites – the lumbar spine and the neck of the femur. If a bone densitometry result suggests a mineral density level that is too low, it clearly indicates an increased risk of potential fracture. According to the findings of the World Health Organization, the results of this test can be used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Patients are classified according to standard guidelines, indicating normal, osteopenia or osteoporosis. Bone mineral density testing also helps determine an individual’s risk of fracture and determine what type of medical therapy to use.

DXA method bone density survey

The standard method for studying bone density is sub-absorptiometryojnej energy of x-rays, or DXA. The use of this technique involves sending energy through an appropriately positioned X-ray tube, through the patient’s spine and hip. The information provided is then processed by computer software, assessing the mass of the bone expressed in g/cm2.

The DXA method unfortunately has many limitations. Due to the low availability of expensive instrumentsow, identifying the risk of fracture is virtually impossible. During the examination, the patient must be properly positioned, which often translates into difficulty in correctly interpreting the result. This leads to numerous inaccuracies created during the analysis stage of the study. DXA software provides the most common automatic identification of sites given a diagnosis, at the target location of the bone under study. For the result to be reliable, the system’s settings must be manually adjusted each time by the technician.